Relentless in its demand for a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) research on 2G spectrum scam, Bharatiya Janata Party led NDA on Thursday attacked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, to "repeated vouchers clean" the former telecom minister A. Raja and claimed that the government was "afraid" of the truths that bother to come out.
In a press conference, the Chairman's working CND LK Advani attacked the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, saying that he too should be held responsible for the scam 2G spectrum allocation.
"The prime minister gave repeated clean vouchers A. Raja, the former telecommunications minister. He was deaf to the national hue and mourn. Parliament first debated this issue in the Rajya Sabha July 23, 2009," he said.
Said the government did not agree to a Joint Parliamentary Committee probably because they are "afraid of the truths that bother looking in the face."
"The government is indifferent to the problem of corruption. And if a complaint is likely to reach high political office, then it becomes quite firm," he said.
The justification for the NDA's insistence on a CPM probe, the main leader of the BJP said there was no parliamentary stagnation done, Raja have not given up.
Advani insisted that despite the Public Accounts Committee is an important organ has a limited mandate and therefore needed to probe CPM. He said his colleague and President Murli Manohar Joshi PAC had been misquoted in a newspaper report on the subject.
"The breadth and magnitude of the issue raised in the case of 2G spectrum allocation are beyond the scope of the Public Accounts Committee. The CAG is an internal auditor of the Government. Various problems related to accounting and auditing matters. The PAC limits itself to paragraph CAG-rational observations. You can not go beyond the issues that were before the CAG, "he said.
He said a large number of these issues are the responsibility of the APA. "Some may overlap with CPM, but there is nothing new or extraordinary about the limited overlap between the two different committees," said Advani.
The work NDA Chairman also mentioned the alleged involvement of corporate lobbyists in the allocation of the portfolio.
"The 2G spectrum allotment scam involves wide range of issues. Why was it necessary for the Telecommunications portfolio would be allocated only to DMK? Corporate interests were at stake that even within the DMK which was to be assigned to only one particular individual to the exclusion of others? "he said.
I also wanted to know if the former telecommunications minister and his associates were in regular contact with corporate lobbyists while formulating the policy of 2G spectrum allocation.
"All these events are of a nature to vindicate our position that the government is serious about corruption," said Advani.
Showing posts with label Government Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government Corruption. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
India: A corrupt dynasty or democracy?
former Finance Minister of India said "dynasticism" played a leading role in promoting the culture of political corruption.
Corruption is crippling India? At first glance, this question seems absurd. After all, India has had a functioning democratic order since before 1947, and its economy weathered the recent global economic crisis that most of the other failed.
However, a combination of factors that have multiplied over time has raised serious concerns about the threat that corruption poses to the very structure of the Indian state.
Of course India is not experiencing any Arab style "Youth shakes" in response to the corruption scandal plaguing the current government led by Congress party, nor is it likely to do so.
India's economy continues its strong annual growth from 8.5 to 9 percent of GDP, a figure that is the envy of many. Competitive elections are routine.
But inequalities and discontent is rising, driven partly by food price inflation, which recently exceeded 20 percent year over year. In fact, the wholesale inflation now stands at over 9 percent.
manufacturing growth has slowed, and the fiscal deficit has risen above 5 percent of GDP, severely stress the economy. As a result, foreign direct investment has declined and interest rates are rising.
Moreover, almost one third of the country's administrative districts are affected by the extreme left "Maoist violence. Externally, the immediate vicinity of India, with Pakistan teetering, is more disturbed than ever.
The concern about "the future of democracy"
But above all these problems is corruption, paralyzing all state bodies and reach its highest offices.
During the session of the Indian Parliament from the previous winter, the opposition (I am a leader of its largest party, the BJP) demanded a Joint Parliamentary Committee (CPC) to investigate a seemingly endless series of public scandals. The government, however, does not compromise on this point, and the opposition refused to budge.
The result was paralysis: a full session of parliament ended not with a single piece of legislative business, government, or other complete. This unprecedented impasse led many to wonder whether political immobility presages worse to come.
In fact, during the confrontation, the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, returning from a meeting of G-20, expressed concern about the future of parliamentary democracy in India. "
Singh grave pronouncement most likely born of the unhappy ending the session of parliament. But it was also the result of misconduct scandal in the Ministry of Telecommunications of India, where some 30 billion may have been siphoning off through corrupt practices, mismanagement of the Commonwealth Games, and many other cases government corruption.
The demand of the opposition of CPM to investigate corruption requires true leadership from the government. Unfortunately, not forthcoming. But what the government rejected in the last legislative session has been recognized in the present, due to growing public pressure.
This delay was both unfortunate and unwise. In the heart of any functioning democratic order must be a relationship to the rule of law. When this is absent, political and economic problems to fill the void.
That is the situation in India today, as many senior officials deliberately indifferent display by the letter of the law and flaunt their defiance of the spirit. Their corruption is debilitating, not only India's parliament, but democracy.
The plague of 'dynasticism'
Corruption may have won the game because the system of India for the redress of grievances has become so slow. The Indians also seem to be losing respect for each other, but are leaving the sense of camaraderie that marked previous years in the country of the fight.
But without a fundamental sense of solidarity with fellow citizens, not parliamentary democracy can function.
There is also a growing sense that India has forgotten how to accommodate dissent, that alternative views are considered completely irrelevant. As a result, the government sees the disagreement as a "disservice" a rebel challenge that must be crushed.
The tone, tenor and content of the language with which the government refers to the opposition, and vice versa, has become ritual, condescending rejection, emptying the spirit of parliamentary democracy. As a courtesy to and accommodation of opposing views are treated as signs of weakness.
In this atmosphere of contempt for the opposition, corruption grows and festers. And corruption, along with a loss of accountability, which is eroding the checks and balances of democratic order in India.
As a result, what remains of representative institutions is an empty shell of residual decision-making, with bribery is the only real talk of government.
The "dynasticism" that has taken firm control over much of Indian politics plays an important role in promoting corruption.
After all, the policy inherited power is the antithesis of democracy and accountability is not part of it. And when the responsibility is absent, both in cunning and feel aggrieved must resort to corrupt means to make known their concerns.
Preserve the hereditary privileges invariably means that government rules and processes to bend, if not wholly subordinated to the dynastic concerns. Today, all of India is paying the price.
Anti Corruption in India
Corruption is a problem that has stood out far and wide by the media over the past years. The government also seems to have taken steps to curb this threat, but not enough. According to the 2007 Global Integrity Index, a significant gap exists between the efforts in terms of planning and implementation. The legal framework is undoubtedly one of the best in the world, and has received high evaluation in terms of anti-corruption laws and institutions. An analysis conducted by Transparency India in 2007 to draw the attention of government the gaps between the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and the legal and institutional framework. The report concluded that while most of the standards conform to the UNCAC, the scope of whistleblower protection was still a problem.
Regardless of that, as mentioned above, the application of these laws and regulations in any form is incomplete and insufficient. The Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 provides that any person who participates in any type of active and passive corruption, extortion, bribery of foreign officials, abuse of authority and money laundering should be criminalized. Another law, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, has been the active participation of the governments of the states that have laws to deal with this area of interest. In 2005, Right to Information (RTI) Act, considered by many to be the most revolutionary and effective achievement in the fight against corruption in recent times, gives a citizen the right to request information from a public authority, and second is necessary to force within 30 days. In the first year of the National RTI, approximately 42. 876 requests for information were presented to the public authorities, central, and according to the Central Information Commission, there has been an increase of 8 to 10 times in these applications since then. Furthermore, less than 5% of the 1 million requests have been denied information as an exceptional case.
Despite all this, the main problem with the application of the strict laws for corruption is that political parties in power, despite a growing enthusiasts to stop this problem, are unable to time the common man striving to eradicate this problem. Even today, people are willing to pay any extra fee at the offices of government to work correctly, and this is the root cause of the problem. While there are people willing to pay under the table, the demand for them exist, and the country would never be able to get rid of this problem.
Another issue that has been continually plagues the legal framework is the lack of a program of protection for whistleblowers. After the murder of Satyendra Dubey, who had exposed the National Highway corruption scandal in the Authority, in 2003, the government has issued a resolution known as the Public Interest Disclosure Resolution (Pidre), authorizing the Central Vigilance Commission ( CVC) to be the 'Designated Agency to receive complaints against corruption. However, such actions would not be effective so far and the politicians who have power are able to threaten the complainant. Strict measures needed in the source for these initiatives to be effective.
Regardless of that, as mentioned above, the application of these laws and regulations in any form is incomplete and insufficient. The Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 provides that any person who participates in any type of active and passive corruption, extortion, bribery of foreign officials, abuse of authority and money laundering should be criminalized. Another law, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, has been the active participation of the governments of the states that have laws to deal with this area of interest. In 2005, Right to Information (RTI) Act, considered by many to be the most revolutionary and effective achievement in the fight against corruption in recent times, gives a citizen the right to request information from a public authority, and second is necessary to force within 30 days. In the first year of the National RTI, approximately 42. 876 requests for information were presented to the public authorities, central, and according to the Central Information Commission, there has been an increase of 8 to 10 times in these applications since then. Furthermore, less than 5% of the 1 million requests have been denied information as an exceptional case.
Despite all this, the main problem with the application of the strict laws for corruption is that political parties in power, despite a growing enthusiasts to stop this problem, are unable to time the common man striving to eradicate this problem. Even today, people are willing to pay any extra fee at the offices of government to work correctly, and this is the root cause of the problem. While there are people willing to pay under the table, the demand for them exist, and the country would never be able to get rid of this problem.
Another issue that has been continually plagues the legal framework is the lack of a program of protection for whistleblowers. After the murder of Satyendra Dubey, who had exposed the National Highway corruption scandal in the Authority, in 2003, the government has issued a resolution known as the Public Interest Disclosure Resolution (Pidre), authorizing the Central Vigilance Commission ( CVC) to be the 'Designated Agency to receive complaints against corruption. However, such actions would not be effective so far and the politicians who have power are able to threaten the complainant. Strict measures needed in the source for these initiatives to be effective.
An Essay: Corruption in India :
Essay: Corruption in India:
Introduction
â € œPower tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts € absolutely.â
It is not easy to define corruption. But in a narrow sense, corruption is primarily concerned with â € ~ € ™ bribery and takes several forms. Corruption is a global phenomenon and is omnipresent. Corruption has risen steadily and is now rampant in our society.
National Stage
Corruption in India is a consequence of the nexus between bureaucracy, politics and criminals. India is no longer considered a soft state. Now it has become a state of mind where everything can be had for a test. Today, the number of ministers with an honest image can be counted on the fingers. At one time, bribe was paid to do things wrong, but now they pay bribes to get things done well at the right time.
Effects of corruption
india administration is tainted with scandals. India is among 55 of the 106 countries where corruption is rampant, according to the Index of Perceived Corruption Report 2004, published by Transparency International India. Corruption in India leads to promotion not prison. It is very difficult to catch big sharks â € ~ € ™. Corruption in India has no wings wheels. As a nation grows, so do the corrupt to invent new methods of cheating the government and the public.
The causes of corruption
The causes of corruption are many and complex. The following are some of the causes of corruption.
 • Appearance of the political elite who believe in programs to interest rather than nation-oriented policies.
 • artificial shortages created by the people with malevolent intent destroys the fabric of the economy.
 • Corruption is caused as well as the increase due to the change in value system and ethical qualities of men who administer. The old ideals of morality, service and honesty are considered a achronistic.
 • The tolerance of people towards corruption, the complete lack of intense public outcry against corruption and the absence of strong public forum to oppose corruption allow corruption to reign over people.
 • The size of most of the population, coupled with widespread illiteracy and poor economic infrastructure tip of the endemic corruption in public life.
 • In a highly inflationary economy, low salaries of government officials are forced to resort to the path of corruption. IIM graduates with no experience in a very attractive salary than what government secretaries draw.
 • complex laws and procedures alienate common people to ask any government assistance.
 • The timing of elections is a time when corruption is at its peak. Great political fund employer to comply with the high cost of the election and ultimately seek personal favor. Bribery to politicians buys influence, and bribery of politicians buying votes. To be elected, politicians bribe poor illiterate people, who are slogging for two times meals € ™.
Measures to combat corruption
Is it possible to contain corruption in our society? Corruption is a cancer, that all Indians should strive to cure. Many new leaders when in power declare their determination to eradicate corruption but soon become corrupt and begin to accumulate huge wealth.
There are many myths about corruption, which must be exploited, if we really want to fight. Some of these myths are: Corruption is a way of life and nothing can be done. Only people from underdeveloped or developing countries are prone to corruption. You have to avoid all these crude fallacies while planning measures to combat corruption.
 • Laws should be foolproof so that no discretion to politicians and bureaucrats. The role of the politician should be minimized. The implementation of the policies developed should be left to the independent commission or authority in every area of public interest. Decision of the commission or authority should be challenged only in court.
 • The cooperation of the people must be obtained to successfully contain corruption. People should have the right to recall elected officials if they see that they become indifferent to the electorate.
 • The financing of elections is at the center of political corruption. Electoral reforms are crucial in this regard. Several reforms such as state funding of election expenses of candidates, strict compliance with legal requirements such as elections in part as political parties have their accounts audited regularly and filing tax income, denying persons with criminal records the opportunity to participate in elections should be presented
 • Responsiveness, accountability and transparency are a must for a clean system. Bureaucracy, the backbone of good governance, should be more citizen friendly, responsible, ethical and transparent.
• Once again the courts should be open to the prompt and inexpensive justice so that cases donâ € ™ t stay in the courts for years and justice is delivered on time.
 • The local bodies independent of government, as Lokpals, Lokadalats, CVC and the vigilance committees should be formed to provide speedy justice with low expenses.
 • A new fundamental right to know. Right to Information should be made, which entitles citizens to seek the information they want. Barring some confidential information that relates to national and international security, another type of information should be available to the general public when necessary. strict measures against corrupt officials will undoubtedly have a deterrent effect.
Conclusion
Corruption is an intractable problem. It's like diabetes, can only be controlled but not completely eliminated. It may not be possible to completely eradicate corruption at all levels, but may contain within tolerable limits. Honest and dedicated persons in public life, control over electoral expenses could be the most important recipe for fighting corruption. Corruption has a corrosive effect on our economy. Worsens our image in the international market and leads to lost opportunities abroad. Corruption is a global problem that all countries of the world are facing, solutions, however, can only be done at home. We tolerated corruption for so long. The time has come to eradicate its roots.
Introduction
â € œPower tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts € absolutely.â
It is not easy to define corruption. But in a narrow sense, corruption is primarily concerned with â € ~ € ™ bribery and takes several forms. Corruption is a global phenomenon and is omnipresent. Corruption has risen steadily and is now rampant in our society.
National Stage
Corruption in India is a consequence of the nexus between bureaucracy, politics and criminals. India is no longer considered a soft state. Now it has become a state of mind where everything can be had for a test. Today, the number of ministers with an honest image can be counted on the fingers. At one time, bribe was paid to do things wrong, but now they pay bribes to get things done well at the right time.
Effects of corruption
india administration is tainted with scandals. India is among 55 of the 106 countries where corruption is rampant, according to the Index of Perceived Corruption Report 2004, published by Transparency International India. Corruption in India leads to promotion not prison. It is very difficult to catch big sharks â € ~ € ™. Corruption in India has no wings wheels. As a nation grows, so do the corrupt to invent new methods of cheating the government and the public.
The causes of corruption
The causes of corruption are many and complex. The following are some of the causes of corruption.
 • Appearance of the political elite who believe in programs to interest rather than nation-oriented policies.
 • artificial shortages created by the people with malevolent intent destroys the fabric of the economy.
 • Corruption is caused as well as the increase due to the change in value system and ethical qualities of men who administer. The old ideals of morality, service and honesty are considered a achronistic.
 • The tolerance of people towards corruption, the complete lack of intense public outcry against corruption and the absence of strong public forum to oppose corruption allow corruption to reign over people.
 • The size of most of the population, coupled with widespread illiteracy and poor economic infrastructure tip of the endemic corruption in public life.
 • In a highly inflationary economy, low salaries of government officials are forced to resort to the path of corruption. IIM graduates with no experience in a very attractive salary than what government secretaries draw.
 • complex laws and procedures alienate common people to ask any government assistance.
 • The timing of elections is a time when corruption is at its peak. Great political fund employer to comply with the high cost of the election and ultimately seek personal favor. Bribery to politicians buys influence, and bribery of politicians buying votes. To be elected, politicians bribe poor illiterate people, who are slogging for two times meals € ™.
Measures to combat corruption
Is it possible to contain corruption in our society? Corruption is a cancer, that all Indians should strive to cure. Many new leaders when in power declare their determination to eradicate corruption but soon become corrupt and begin to accumulate huge wealth.
There are many myths about corruption, which must be exploited, if we really want to fight. Some of these myths are: Corruption is a way of life and nothing can be done. Only people from underdeveloped or developing countries are prone to corruption. You have to avoid all these crude fallacies while planning measures to combat corruption.
 • Laws should be foolproof so that no discretion to politicians and bureaucrats. The role of the politician should be minimized. The implementation of the policies developed should be left to the independent commission or authority in every area of public interest. Decision of the commission or authority should be challenged only in court.
 • The cooperation of the people must be obtained to successfully contain corruption. People should have the right to recall elected officials if they see that they become indifferent to the electorate.
 • The financing of elections is at the center of political corruption. Electoral reforms are crucial in this regard. Several reforms such as state funding of election expenses of candidates, strict compliance with legal requirements such as elections in part as political parties have their accounts audited regularly and filing tax income, denying persons with criminal records the opportunity to participate in elections should be presented
 • Responsiveness, accountability and transparency are a must for a clean system. Bureaucracy, the backbone of good governance, should be more citizen friendly, responsible, ethical and transparent.
• Once again the courts should be open to the prompt and inexpensive justice so that cases donâ € ™ t stay in the courts for years and justice is delivered on time.
 • The local bodies independent of government, as Lokpals, Lokadalats, CVC and the vigilance committees should be formed to provide speedy justice with low expenses.
 • A new fundamental right to know. Right to Information should be made, which entitles citizens to seek the information they want. Barring some confidential information that relates to national and international security, another type of information should be available to the general public when necessary. strict measures against corrupt officials will undoubtedly have a deterrent effect.
Conclusion
Corruption is an intractable problem. It's like diabetes, can only be controlled but not completely eliminated. It may not be possible to completely eradicate corruption at all levels, but may contain within tolerable limits. Honest and dedicated persons in public life, control over electoral expenses could be the most important recipe for fighting corruption. Corruption has a corrosive effect on our economy. Worsens our image in the international market and leads to lost opportunities abroad. Corruption is a global problem that all countries of the world are facing, solutions, however, can only be done at home. We tolerated corruption for so long. The time has come to eradicate its roots.
India's Sleaze Sheet in Corruption: India Today
Corruption is the only issue that has finally emerged a national consensus. While all agree India is a corrupt country, which was to identify the nuances of public perception on corruption in India today and ORG-MARG opinion poll conducted this. The corruption survey covered 16 major state capitals and respondents 1743. In the case of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh common capital was replaced by the largest cities, respectively, Ludhiana and Faridabad.
Respondents were asked to rank the three most corrupt states in India in that order. They were then asked to do the same for at least three rogue states. Questions were also asked about corruption in state administration in particular and in the Center. This was to examine whether corruption is seen as filtered down from Delhi, or if the roots of the phenomenon seems to be found in the states. Finally, respondents were asked about the personalities and public service areas are considered more conducive to corruption.
The story that emerged was generally expected. However, there were some surprises. For example, the ranking of Assam as the fourth most corrupt province in the Union could, in part, be attributed to the negative publicity it has received in recent times due to the issue of Tata Tea-ULFA extortion. In addition, politicians dominated the list of people considered indecent. In general, however, Bihar led the way: most corrupt state, India's most corrupt - was an indisputable (and presumably embarrassed) winner.
INDIAN WHO IS THE MOST CORRUPT OF ALL?
Laloo Prasad Yadav and PV Narasimha Rao: Nationally, no one came even close to them. In Bihar, Laloo was named the most corrupt in India by 53 percent. Mulayam Singh Yadav found favor with 15 percent of voters in Uttar Pradesh, Mayawati, with 11. Jyoti Basu polled 11 percent in West Bengal. Two senior ministers, Prafulla Mahanta (Assam) and N. Chandrababu Naidu (Andhra Pradesh), won 10 percent in their states. Harshad Mehta was the leading non-political, with 5 percent in Maharashtra.
What public service agencies are the most corrupt?
The answers were a damning indictment of the Indian state. Despite nearly half a century of democracy, government agencies emerged as a prolific breeding ground for corruption. Ministers, elected representatives of the people, headed the list of groups that are likely to consider a non-transparent operation.
The police arrived a dishonorable second, in the Punjab, in fact, exceeded even ministers. It is also noteworthy that on a scale of one to 10 not a public service agency suggested to respondents scored less than five.
Despite their problems within the decision of the United Front, the left can take heart from this survey of opinion. The two states that India is seen as the least contaminated are ruled by CPI (M)-led coalitions. The BJP can afford a smile, and the two following states in terms of honesty - Rajasthan and Punjab - are governed by it, either alone or in coalition. Although corruption cuts across the differences between regions, the Hindi belt are disproportionately represented in the top of the pyramid, with Bihar a winner out of control.
Equally significant is the comparison between perceptions of corruption in the Central and State administration. Only four of the 16 states consider that the Union Government is more inclined towards bribery and fraud scheme in the particular state. Interestingly, Delhi - which is the seat of Government of India and a state of right - the national governing trusts less than the locals. The most charitable view of the Centre seem to come from Bihar, where scores of state administration 2.5 points higher on the scale of corruption.
Given a state synonymous with theft system, India is destined to remain in bondage to the kleptocracy? Cut discretionary powers, rewarding honest public officials - the solutions are all there in theory. What is missing is action. India needs to clean, as of yesterday.
Respondents were asked to rank the three most corrupt states in India in that order. They were then asked to do the same for at least three rogue states. Questions were also asked about corruption in state administration in particular and in the Center. This was to examine whether corruption is seen as filtered down from Delhi, or if the roots of the phenomenon seems to be found in the states. Finally, respondents were asked about the personalities and public service areas are considered more conducive to corruption.
The story that emerged was generally expected. However, there were some surprises. For example, the ranking of Assam as the fourth most corrupt province in the Union could, in part, be attributed to the negative publicity it has received in recent times due to the issue of Tata Tea-ULFA extortion. In addition, politicians dominated the list of people considered indecent. In general, however, Bihar led the way: most corrupt state, India's most corrupt - was an indisputable (and presumably embarrassed) winner.
INDIAN WHO IS THE MOST CORRUPT OF ALL?
Laloo Prasad Yadav and PV Narasimha Rao: Nationally, no one came even close to them. In Bihar, Laloo was named the most corrupt in India by 53 percent. Mulayam Singh Yadav found favor with 15 percent of voters in Uttar Pradesh, Mayawati, with 11. Jyoti Basu polled 11 percent in West Bengal. Two senior ministers, Prafulla Mahanta (Assam) and N. Chandrababu Naidu (Andhra Pradesh), won 10 percent in their states. Harshad Mehta was the leading non-political, with 5 percent in Maharashtra.
What public service agencies are the most corrupt?
The answers were a damning indictment of the Indian state. Despite nearly half a century of democracy, government agencies emerged as a prolific breeding ground for corruption. Ministers, elected representatives of the people, headed the list of groups that are likely to consider a non-transparent operation.
The police arrived a dishonorable second, in the Punjab, in fact, exceeded even ministers. It is also noteworthy that on a scale of one to 10 not a public service agency suggested to respondents scored less than five.
Despite their problems within the decision of the United Front, the left can take heart from this survey of opinion. The two states that India is seen as the least contaminated are ruled by CPI (M)-led coalitions. The BJP can afford a smile, and the two following states in terms of honesty - Rajasthan and Punjab - are governed by it, either alone or in coalition. Although corruption cuts across the differences between regions, the Hindi belt are disproportionately represented in the top of the pyramid, with Bihar a winner out of control.
Equally significant is the comparison between perceptions of corruption in the Central and State administration. Only four of the 16 states consider that the Union Government is more inclined towards bribery and fraud scheme in the particular state. Interestingly, Delhi - which is the seat of Government of India and a state of right - the national governing trusts less than the locals. The most charitable view of the Centre seem to come from Bihar, where scores of state administration 2.5 points higher on the scale of corruption.
Given a state synonymous with theft system, India is destined to remain in bondage to the kleptocracy? Cut discretionary powers, rewarding honest public officials - the solutions are all there in theory. What is missing is action. India needs to clean, as of yesterday.
Corruption threatens India's high growth momentum: KPMG
NEW DELHI: endemic corruption in India has grown in scale and represents billions of dollars, to discourage potential investors and derail growth prospects, the consultancy firm KPMG said in a survey published on Monday.
The survey of 100 national leaders and foreign companies was published in the government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the struggle to defend against corruption scandal ranging from 39 billion U.S. dollars of telecommunications to the homes of war widows diverted to bureaucrats.
The fraud, exposed in recent months, point to a pervasive culture of corruption in the administration of Singh, which led to a man once seen as the most honest politician in India to defend its leadership and its fight to keep intact the governing coalition.
And the graft guessing the third largest economy in Asia is no longer limited to bribe government officials in the passport or telephone connections provider of state, the report said.
"Today India is facing a different kind of challenge," said the report. "It is not small bribes (" Bakshish ') again, but scams worth billions of rupees (billions of rupees) to highlight the link between the political industry that, if unchecked, could have a powerful impact. "
Most of the companies surveyed said they were committed to their positions in one of the fastest growing economies in the world with a kind of rapid growth, and richest, medium, according to the survey.
More than two thirds of respondents said that corruption prevents India from moving beyond the 9 percent growth expected in the next fiscal year beginning 1 April. Just over half said graft would make the country less attractive to foreign investors.
"Corruption represents a threat to India projects a 9 percent GDP growth and could result in an environment of political and economic volatility," said the report.
The troubled real estate sectors and the construction - an approach to India as it plans to spend $ 1500000000000 more than a decade to reform the creaking infrastructure - telecommunications followed where the state was still very involved and the high stakes.
The scandals have created a sense of legal uncertainty, especially in the telecommunications sector, which has been the subject of much scrutiny after the erroneous allocation process is said to cost the government up to $ 39 billion in lost revenue.
The survey of 100 national leaders and foreign companies was published in the government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the struggle to defend against corruption scandal ranging from 39 billion U.S. dollars of telecommunications to the homes of war widows diverted to bureaucrats.
The fraud, exposed in recent months, point to a pervasive culture of corruption in the administration of Singh, which led to a man once seen as the most honest politician in India to defend its leadership and its fight to keep intact the governing coalition.
And the graft guessing the third largest economy in Asia is no longer limited to bribe government officials in the passport or telephone connections provider of state, the report said.
"Today India is facing a different kind of challenge," said the report. "It is not small bribes (" Bakshish ') again, but scams worth billions of rupees (billions of rupees) to highlight the link between the political industry that, if unchecked, could have a powerful impact. "
Most of the companies surveyed said they were committed to their positions in one of the fastest growing economies in the world with a kind of rapid growth, and richest, medium, according to the survey.
More than two thirds of respondents said that corruption prevents India from moving beyond the 9 percent growth expected in the next fiscal year beginning 1 April. Just over half said graft would make the country less attractive to foreign investors.
"Corruption represents a threat to India projects a 9 percent GDP growth and could result in an environment of political and economic volatility," said the report.
The troubled real estate sectors and the construction - an approach to India as it plans to spend $ 1500000000000 more than a decade to reform the creaking infrastructure - telecommunications followed where the state was still very involved and the high stakes.
The scandals have created a sense of legal uncertainty, especially in the telecommunications sector, which has been the subject of much scrutiny after the erroneous allocation process is said to cost the government up to $ 39 billion in lost revenue.
'India against Corruption' member Anna Hazare on fast unto death over Lokpal Bill
NEW DELHI: Thousands of people joined veteran social activist Anna Hazare in Jantar Mantar in central Delhi on Tuesday as he began his "fast unto death to press for a stronger graft-versus Lokpal bill through greater civil society participation in its drafting.
India waving flags and banners in support of a law against corruption more effective, supporters gathered at Rajghat Memorial to Mahatma Gandhi on Tuesday morning, where Hazare made his homage to Mahatma before starting the hunger strike. Supporters also jammed the India Gate and Jantar Mantar, as the activist finally sat down fast.
"I'm leaving quickly because we want the representation of civil society in drafting the bill Lokpal, 50 percent of civil society and 50 percent of the government. If the systems of government the bill without the participation of the people, there will be democracy, is the bureaucracy, "Hazare told reporters before embarking on his fast at Jantar Mantar.
The Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today expressed "deep disappointment" Hazare's decision to proceed with the planned hunger strike, but said he had a tremendous respect for the worker and his mission.
However, Hazare said that if he respected Prime Minister, who should have met with the activists.
"The prime minister says I have faith and respect for you ... why not sit for the debate even for a day with us?" the Magsaysay awardee said.
Hazare, who had announced an indefinite hunger strike for over a month, has been demanding the representation of civil society in drafting the bill Lokpal against corruption.
Although the activists failed to meet the Prime Minister, his meeting with a ministerial committee formed to study the bill failed to resolve the impasse because the government did not accept their demand to include members of civil society in drafting of legislation.
Hazare Jantar Mantar of followers included people from all walks of life, from students to professionals and activists.
"I'm here because Anna is risking his life to make the country free of corruption," said Ramesh Rajpal, who arrived at Jantar Mantar in Gurgaon to support the hunger strike.
Most people who joined the demonstration also seen quickly.
"If we can get to the streets to celebrate the victory of the World Cup, why not get out to support Anna. It is a struggle for the country to clean," said the student at the University of Delhi Srikant Jaiswal.
Accompanying Hazare include Right to Information (RTI) activist Arvind Kejriwal and former police officer Kiran Bedi high.
Reject the bill Lokpal prepared by the government as a toothless law, activists are demanding that the government adopt the Lokpal Jan alternative bill drafted by activist Arvind Kejriwal, former Supreme Court Justice Santosh Hegde, lawyers and senior Prashant Bhushan.
Jan Lokpal The bill, which has been prepared after extensive consultations among activists and ordinary people across the country, calls for the establishment of ombudsmen - Lokpal and Lokayuktas (in the states) - independent of government control In order to control corruption in public life.
Activists say the research conducted by the ombudsman should be completed within one year and must have a minimum term of imprisonment of five years and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The government's version, however, recommended a prison sentence of at least six months and a maximum penalty of seven years for corruption.
Rewrite
India waving flags and banners in support of a law against corruption more effective, supporters gathered at Rajghat Memorial to Mahatma Gandhi on Tuesday morning, where Hazare made his homage to Mahatma before starting the hunger strike. Supporters also jammed the India Gate and Jantar Mantar, as the activist finally sat down fast.
"I'm leaving quickly because we want the representation of civil society in drafting the bill Lokpal, 50 percent of civil society and 50 percent of the government. If the systems of government the bill without the participation of the people, there will be democracy, is the bureaucracy, "Hazare told reporters before embarking on his fast at Jantar Mantar.
The Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today expressed "deep disappointment" Hazare's decision to proceed with the planned hunger strike, but said he had a tremendous respect for the worker and his mission.
However, Hazare said that if he respected Prime Minister, who should have met with the activists.
"The prime minister says I have faith and respect for you ... why not sit for the debate even for a day with us?" the Magsaysay awardee said.
Hazare, who had announced an indefinite hunger strike for over a month, has been demanding the representation of civil society in drafting the bill Lokpal against corruption.
Although the activists failed to meet the Prime Minister, his meeting with a ministerial committee formed to study the bill failed to resolve the impasse because the government did not accept their demand to include members of civil society in drafting of legislation.
Hazare Jantar Mantar of followers included people from all walks of life, from students to professionals and activists.
"I'm here because Anna is risking his life to make the country free of corruption," said Ramesh Rajpal, who arrived at Jantar Mantar in Gurgaon to support the hunger strike.
Most people who joined the demonstration also seen quickly.
"If we can get to the streets to celebrate the victory of the World Cup, why not get out to support Anna. It is a struggle for the country to clean," said the student at the University of Delhi Srikant Jaiswal.
Accompanying Hazare include Right to Information (RTI) activist Arvind Kejriwal and former police officer Kiran Bedi high.
Reject the bill Lokpal prepared by the government as a toothless law, activists are demanding that the government adopt the Lokpal Jan alternative bill drafted by activist Arvind Kejriwal, former Supreme Court Justice Santosh Hegde, lawyers and senior Prashant Bhushan.
Jan Lokpal The bill, which has been prepared after extensive consultations among activists and ordinary people across the country, calls for the establishment of ombudsmen - Lokpal and Lokayuktas (in the states) - independent of government control In order to control corruption in public life.
Activists say the research conducted by the ombudsman should be completed within one year and must have a minimum term of imprisonment of five years and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The government's version, however, recommended a prison sentence of at least six months and a maximum penalty of seven years for corruption.
Rewrite
Monday, April 4, 2011
Government Corruption - What Say You?
There is much talk of voters angry about the way our government is incompetent, what kind of release all the "wisdom of crowds" theory of the window and makes us rethink the thought of group or committee-based solution strategy. Then, on the contrary, you hear people say "no, the government is incompetent, corrupt." Well, what is? Hard to say, but we will have a brief dialogue in the case of corruption and unethical behavior that has infiltrated our government at all levels.
We know city councilors and women take donations from city contractors, companies of garbage and trash, and those are franchises granted (local monopoly) for municipal contracts. This is a huge state-level PACs by the government employee unions are giving large campaign donations needed to win the election.
And we know what happens in Washington, DC, where regulations are voted into law by the Senate, thanks to the carefully placed lobbyists, which are specifically designed to put barriers to entry by competitors of the companies that turn out to be payment made by lobbyists huge campaign donations. That's how it works, but it's all supposedly legal, even if it smells like corruption.
Not long ago, I was arguing with a Hollywood actor to the challenges of leading a group of scholars and some of the most difficult dilemmas of mankind in the future. We both realized how actors and actresses had so much power in shaping our national debate and policy, and both agreed that it was essential to make things right.
One of the issues on our list was "government corruption" and the discussion of this, he said;
"Well, the issue of government ethics, I would add that government corruption is ambiguous and generally not exceed accusations between the candidates before the election."
In fact, this is absolutely true, and yet I think everybody realizes that there is one side, political party, nor is it a level or branch of government. In fact, government bureaucrats, politicians all come from our own society, and people on the streets of Hollywood to steal the bike out of Starbucks to people who would remove a financial scam. Therefore, it is not that we should be destroying the government.
Yet, "corruption in government" is not just in the U.S., is all governments, ours is actually often be the least corrupt, although I do not think reading a scandalous allegations times. We must admit the media has a field day with it all year, often blowing out of proportion every little thing. Now that does not mean that government corruption there is, absolutely not, take for example, Congressman with 100s of thousands of dollars wrapped in his freezer?
Perhaps we should bear in mind that the government is made up of people of our population, and perhaps the real problem is that we are letting slip ethics at all levels of society, therefore no wonder none of these . Please be thinking here!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)